<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WILL NEW BLOOD HELP THE GOP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightaislereview.com/2009/06/10/will-new-blood-help-the-gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightaislereview.com/2009/06/10/will-new-blood-help-the-gop/</link>
	<description>The Online Edition of the Conservative and Libertarian Newspaper at Belmont University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickey</title>
		<link>http://rightaislereview.com/2009/06/10/will-new-blood-help-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightaislereview.wordpress.com/?p=346#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Economic Stimulus. H.R. 5140, the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, passed 385-35 on January 29, 2008 (Roll Call 25). It would provide about $150 billion in economic stimulus, including $101.1 billion in direct payments of rebate checks (typically $600) to most taxpayers in 2008 and temporary tax breaks for businesses. Creating money out of thin air and then spending the newly created money cannot improve the economy, at least not in the long term. (If it could, why not create even more money for rebates and make every American a millionaire?) The stimulus has no offset and thus increases the federal deficit by the amount of the stimulus because the government must borrow the rebate money. A realistic long-term stimulus can only be achieved by lowering taxes through less government and by reducing regulatory burdens.Marsha Blackburn voted FOR this bill.(Source: The New American – July 21, 2008)  

Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman. 
She is no conservative. 
See her unconstitutional votes at : 
http://bluecollarrepublican.com/blog/?p=614
Mickey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic Stimulus. H.R. 5140, the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, passed 385-35 on January 29, 2008 (Roll Call 25). It would provide about $150 billion in economic stimulus, including $101.1 billion in direct payments of rebate checks (typically $600) to most taxpayers in 2008 and temporary tax breaks for businesses. Creating money out of thin air and then spending the newly created money cannot improve the economy, at least not in the long term. (If it could, why not create even more money for rebates and make every American a millionaire?) The stimulus has no offset and thus increases the federal deficit by the amount of the stimulus because the government must borrow the rebate money. A realistic long-term stimulus can only be achieved by lowering taxes through less government and by reducing regulatory burdens.Marsha Blackburn voted FOR this bill.(Source: The New American – July 21, 2008)  </p>
<p>Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman.<br />
She is no conservative.<br />
See her unconstitutional votes at :<br />
<a href="http://bluecollarrepublican.com/blog/?p=614" rel="nofollow">http://bluecollarrepublican.com/blog/?p=614</a><br />
Mickey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan Baily</title>
		<link>http://rightaislereview.com/2009/06/10/will-new-blood-help-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>susan Baily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightaislereview.wordpress.com/?p=346#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I do not believe the Republican Party lost the election because they were not bipartisan enough or lacked sophisticated methods to engage their base.  They lost because the Republican Party was not sure what it believed in or afraid to admit what they believe in.  Our cultural obsession with tolerance!   The truth always divides as it must.  Hence the Party needs to find what it believes and stand for it without excuse.  Their base knows what they believe....it would be great to find the Grand &#039;Ole Party not ashamed to articulate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe the Republican Party lost the election because they were not bipartisan enough or lacked sophisticated methods to engage their base.  They lost because the Republican Party was not sure what it believed in or afraid to admit what they believe in.  Our cultural obsession with tolerance!   The truth always divides as it must.  Hence the Party needs to find what it believes and stand for it without excuse.  Their base knows what they believe&#8230;.it would be great to find the Grand &#8216;Ole Party not ashamed to articulate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
